Archive for February, 2012
» posted on Sunday, February 26th, 2012 at 8:59 pm by Andy D
The Problem with Insurance Provided Contraception.
President Obama recently stated that he was going to force religious groups and organizations to provide abortion and contraceptive coverage to their employees for free. There was a lot of complaining about this, most notably in the Catholic church. Some religious groups currently don’t cover contraception. They believe contraception and abortion are morally wrong and they don’t want to encourage their employees to do something they believe is wrong. They also don’t want to pay for something they find offensive.
Many people also complained that this was the same as the government telling the Catholic church how to worship. The President then said that if that was offensive to religious groups, he would instead force their insurance provides to cover it so that the church doesn’t have to. This is a slight of hand at best. Seven states have filed suit against the federal government arguing that the federal government is violating the first amendment to the US Constitution.
This looks like an election year campaign trick. The Obama administration wants voters to believe that the only thing standing between their birth control pills and the Republican party is president Obama. In truth, Republicans are not interested in outlawing contraception. There is no candidate running with the intention of outlawing birth control pills.
Besides this being a campaign trick, I think there is a much larger issue here. This is a new power the federal government has just assumed. For the president to wake up one day and suddenly decide that an insurance company has to cover anything at 100%, or any other percentage is illegal. The president doesn’t have that authority. It doesn’t matter if it’s birth control, abortion, flu shots, or aspirin, the president doesn’t get to dictate what an insurance company does or doesn’t cover.
I would also caution those that support the president on this. If any president has the power to dictate what can and cant be covered and at what costs, then all presidents do. This opens a Pandoras box that may never be closed. What’s to keep a future conservative President from decreeing that abortion can’t be covered by ANY insurance company at ANY percentage? Why couldn’t a future president forbid auto insurance companies from insuring hybrid or electric cars, thereby killing that entire industry? If you agree with president Obama’s dictate to cover contraception, then you have to support these as legal as well.
Voters need to recognize this for what it is. The president is trying to distract voters from the economy. In doing so, he has reached for more power than he is allowed in the Constitution. We need to hold the president to the powers he actually has and we need to pass judgement on his economy this November.
6 comments | filed under health care · Obama · Obamacare
» posted on Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012 at 5:46 am by Andy D
Guest Post: The Goal of Education
The following is aguest post submitted by Pack04. Pack is a regular reader and commenter here.
“‘The goals of No Child Left Behind were the right ones. Standards and accountability, those are the right goals,’ Obama said. But he said educators shouldn’t have to ‘teach to the test,’ and said the new benchmarks will incorporate other factors for measuring school and teacher achievement. ” -AP
School and teacher achievement???? What about a child’s achievement??? Just because you go to the best school does not mean you are a genius, nor does going to the worst school mean you are an idiot. If you set school and teacher achievement on standards as your benchmarks of course they will teach to the test. And if you think teachers cheating on tests now is bad wait till you tie salary increases to student’s test results as the President’s Race to the Top program wants to do.
My wife is a teacher. She has some dumb students in a class. She also has kids that score low on tests and have low grades in the class because they are LAZY. They have no want or care to do well. They are smart; they can do the work, they just don’t. There is no accountability on students. How can a teacher be expected to teach a child that just does not care? Some kids are blessed with intelligence, some are not. You just can’t teach what is not there. If we could, then why do we set the bar so low? Let’s push and try and educate everybody to be a Steven Hawking! We don’t because you can’t make somebody a genius that is not one. So why do we feel the need to get everybody to read at their grade level? Plus by doing that you set up the thought that hey I am where I need to be, I don’t need to be better than that. Teachers see who meets their grade level and then spend less time with them. Less time pushing them, teaching them more, all so they can meet this random line in the sand for the dumb kids.
Perhaps if our leaders actually had a backbone and enforced rules things would change. When No Child Left Behind passed in early 2000′s states looked at it and said it is going to be hard to make it, but if we look like we are trying, they will not take money away from us. They won’t let the poor kids lose their chance. Guess what? They were right!!!!
The President allowed these exemptions because he did not like the law and Congress would not do as he said and fix it. So he just breaks the law and does whatever he wants.
That is not a leader. That does not teach the correct lesson, this does not teach those kids that are lazy to do what they need to do to succeed. It teaches if something is too hard and you don’t like it, don’t do it.
Now I would blame Congress for not working on this but supposedly the Senate had a BIPARTISAN deal worked out last year but the President did not like it so they dropped it. He is a president not a dictator. He does not get what he wants all the time. Grow a spine, Congress, take back your power.
3 comments | filed under education · guest blog
» posted on Monday, February 20th, 2012 at 5:52 pm by Andy D
It’s been a while…
I’ve been having difficulties with my internet. It seems every thing is worked out now. I hope to resume a regular posting schedule this week. I plan to use a guest post tomorrow night from a regular reader here with another post by the end of the week.
post a comment | filed under nothing to do with politics
» posted on Wednesday, February 8th, 2012 at 6:43 pm by Andy D
Book Review: How Do You Kill 11 Million People?
“The punishment which the wise suffer who refuse to take part in the government, is to live under the government of worse men.”
-Plato
I heard about this book while I was on vacation, and had to run out and pick it up. It’s a small book, and can be read in one setting. I hope you read this review and run out and grab your own copy.
“How Do You Kill 11 Million People?” by Andy Andrews looks at the importance of politicians telling the truth. Some of the recent discussions on here have turned to questions of truth and politicians. I thought this also made it an interesting subject since we are going through a presidential election right now. Mr. Andrews looks at why its’ important for us to keep our elected officials honest. He does this with a case study: How was Hitler able to kill 11 million people inside of Germany without its people rising up against him?
Hitler started with a small lie. The Nazi’s would go to a community and start erecting fencing and barbed wire around it. They would warn the community that the Russians were on their way and the fencing was for the protection of the community. The community accepted it because, after all, the government was only trying to protect them. At some point, officials from the government would show up to meet with the community. According to Andrews, an official would say something similar to this:
Jews: At last, it can be reported to you that the Russians are advancing on our eastern front. I apologize for the hasty way we brought you into our protection. Unfortunately, there was little time to explain. You have nothing to worry about. We want only the best for you. You will leave here shortly and be sent to very fine places indeed. You will work there, your wives will state at home, and your children will go to school. You will have wonderful lives. We will all be terribly crowded on the trains, but the journey is short. Men? Please keep your families together and board the railcars in an orderly manner. Quickly now, my friends, we must hurry!
There are two reasons why we should all pay close attention to Mr. Andrews books. First, he isn’t arguing from a Republican / Conservative or Democrat / Liberal point of view. Instead, he is only trying to point out what can happen when we don’t hold our elected officials accountable. Second, he isn’t arguing that anyone currently in government is going to start killing people in our communities. However, unchecked, they might someday.
One way Mr. Andrews suggests keeping our elected officials honest: verify what they say. With the advent of the internet, youtube, and blogs like this one, it’s easy to verify what any candidate or activist says. Voting records of most elected officials are public record. Most people believe politicians are dishonest, but how many times have you actually fact checked anything a politician said to you?
This should apply to politicians we disagree with AND agree with. While everyone wants Congress and the Senate kicked out of office, most people would like to keep their representative. Yet, how many of us believe our own representatives are honest with us? How much dishonesty are we willing to accept from a candidate?
How Do You Kill 11 Million People? is a very quick read, but is very powerful. Mr. Andrews says in his book that:
I wrote this book for you to use as a tool. I wrote it for you to give away. I wrote it for you to discuss and preach about and read to your children. I believe that now, more than ever, America needs to be challenged and inspired to participate.
I challenge you to check up on your own favorite candidate and on the President during this election cycle.
6 comments | filed under Book Review
» posted on Thursday, February 2nd, 2012 at 4:29 am by Andy D
The Republican Base has had it!
I don’t like to repost articles or long quotes on this site. However, occasionally I come across something that I think is worth sharing. Rush Limbaugh opened his show after the South Carolina primary with a few incredibly insightful comments. I found myself agreeing with everything he said. I wanted to post it here to get everyone else’s take on it. Rush started talking about this when trying to explain Newt Gingrich’s success in the South Carolina primary. He starts by arguing that the questions about Newt’s former wife weren’t what catapulted him into the lead in South Carolina. From the Rush Limbaugh Show:
Why did those questions tee Newt up, and why did Newt know what to do with them? Very simple. I’ve been doing this show for 23 years, and one of my themes from the beginning, from 1988, has been that the American conservative middle class are the ones playing by the rules. They are the ones that obey the law to the best of their ability. They raise their kids. They try to shield their kids from cultural rot and depravity. They try to keep them off drugs. They try to get them into college. They follow as best they can all the rules and they’re laughed at and made fun of and they are impugned everywhere they look. They go to the movies, they’re mocked and made fun of. They turn on the radio, listen to music, they’re laughed at, mocked, and made fun of. They turn on television, watch an average television show, they are laughed at, mocked and made fun of. They open the newspaper, same thing. They’ve had it. They’ve been dealing with this for over 20 years, and nobody’s fought back for ‘em. Not one person ever has fought back for ‘em.
The last time somebody actually spoke up in this large a forum, a presidential forum, would have to be Reagan; and Reagan did it not so much by what he said (although he had his moments). He did it by winning. He did it by skunking these people! Since then, the Republican leadership has not seemed focused so much on winning and they sit there and they take it. Whenever their own voters are insulted — when their own voters are laughed at and impugned and called racists, sexist, bigot homophobes — the Republicans don’t defend them nor themselves because they’re scared to death the independents are gonna be upset, or the media is gonna be upset.
So the base of the Republican Party, the voters, have been bottling up for 25 years, a resentment — an anger, if you will — that their own party won’t fight for them, won’t fight for itself, won’t fight for what’s right. So when Newt gets teed up with these questions from Juan Williams and John King and whoever else and simply says what they’ve been thinking for 25 years, they say, “Finally!” What they want right now is fight-back, what they want is push-back, what they want is kick-back, what they want is smack-down! What they want is for these people who have been laughing at them and mocking them and impugning them, put in their place.
They’re tired of the cultural rot taking place in the country. They’re tired of the incessant growth of government and spending. They’re tired of it, and they’re frustrated as they can be that members of their own party who get elected can’t seem to articulate their own passions. Politics is about passion, and the Republican Party doesn’t seem to have it! There’s always fear of somebody. Fear of the media, fear of Democrats. Well, Newt doesn’t act like he’s got any fear. So how many wives does he got? “I don’t care!” What did he do for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac? “I don’t care.” What are his national disapproval ratings?
“I don’t care! Finally somebody’s telling the bad guys who they are, what to do and that we’re not gonna take it anymore — or that we don’t want to take it anymore.” Now, you can sit there and you can say that that’s cockeyed, that elections aren’t won that way. Uhhhh, they aren’t? Who just won? Who’s already leading in the polls in Florida? George Will had a fascinating statistic over the weekend. Mitt Romney — Mr. Electability, according to the Republican establishment; Mr. The Only Guy That Can Give Us the Senate — is 9-and-16 in his election career. He’s won nine and lost 16. He’s nine out of 25. That, they tell us, is Mr. Electability — and they’re sitting around, the base is, and they’re saying, “We don’t care about this traditional stuff that you care about that’s kept you in second place all these years.”
16 comments | filed under culture · Rush Limbaugh